Maxharvest Plus Update 3 1/2 Months

This is why the Maxharvest Plus procedure is far superior to FUE or any machine that extracts grafts.

FUE would limit the amount of hairs in one procedure to a maximum amount, best case scenario, 4,000 hairs.  Some FUE procedures might max out at 1,000 - 2,000 hairs and it takes a 10 hour day or two to get them.  FUE is also limited to certain hair types.   Dr. Bolton yielded 12,000 hairs and his staff implanted them all in under 6 hours.  Dr. Bolton has no limitations on who he can do the procedure for.

The FUE would have covered 10-15 % of the bald area.  Dr. Bolton covered 100%.

The coverage Dr. Bolton can get his patients is unmatched by any other procedure available.

The density of the Maxharvest Plus is unmatched and the one procedure result after one year is unmatched.

FUE is touted as the "New Method" .  It is a not.  The only thing new about it is that there are now machines available to take the donor follicle one at a time.  This was done, albeit, not in the exact manner but similarly when doctors offered  the plug procedure.  One punch at a time with a 4mm instrument.

Today it is one punch at a time with a .08 instrument.  Hardly revolutionary.  More marketing creativity by the manufacturers of the machine then a new procedure.  Repackaging of an old method made to look new.  The unassuming public wants to believe that there is always a better way.  I advise anyone who is interested to look past the sensational claims (which are not true) of scarless surgery, work the next day, easier then the current method and less invasive to actually focus on the final results.  If you have more then minimal hair loss you should demand to see many patients who have benefitted from this "new",  "advanced" procedure.  If it is such a remarkable new procedure that has been available the last 4 years where are all the great one procedure results?

Buyer Beware.

 

Before

Before

3 1/2 months later and one more year of growth to come.

Felipe's beginning result is already superior to an FUE.  He has approximately 20% growth.

He already has over 2,000 hairs growing.  This is more then most FUE can deliver in one procedure.

He has total coverage from front to back and another year of improvement to come.  This kind of result is impossible to get with FUE.  How is FUE more advanced or superior?

FUE Repair Case

Scarless procedure?

More scars actually and zero results.

Buyer Beware!

To be fair, this is an extreme example.  To not explain that would be doing the same thing FUE proponents do.  That is to take a worst case scenario scar from FUT and imply that is the kind of scar you can expect if you do that type of surgery.  The truth is: both surgeries leave scars.  Different type of scar.  One a line the  many dots.  If done properly,  the line will never be seen if you keep you hair above 1/4 to 1/2 inch depending on the type of hair you have.  The same for FUE.  If you cut your hair too short there is the likelihood the dots can be soon.  No ethical doctor can  tell you that with a shaved head you will not see scars.